How can enterprises avoid getting angry in the bat

2022-08-17
  • Detail

How can enterprises avoid "getting angry" in the "battlefield" of patent attack and defense

led lighting industry has developed rapidly in recent years. However, after the rapid development and expansion, the symptoms of subsequent weakness in the LED industry are becoming more and more obvious, and patents have increasingly become the bottleneck for the further development of led enterprises. From the appearance of lighting to the internal structure, many domestic led enterprises that lack core competitiveness regard imitation and plagiarism as the only way out, which has deeply harmed many enterprises that pay attention to patent research

in recent years, when using medical devices containing PVC for treatment, the semiconductor lighting industry has gradually got rid of the hat of low technology content. The first wave of technological innovation has been basically completed, and patents have also become a powerful weapon for enterprises to expand the market and attack competitors

in 2017, patent litigation cases in the LED industry have increased unabated, with major domestic and foreign manufacturers such as Nichia, Yiguang, Seoul semiconductor, etc. constantly making efforts in the patent battlefield

[Nichia vs four enterprises]

in January 2017, Nichia, a Japanese LED manufacturer, pointed out that it had filed four patent infringement lawsuits in the Federal District Court of East Texas in the United States on December 27, 2016, accusing four companies, including LCD TV and LED lighting manufacturers:

(1) TTE technology, Inc., an American LCD TV dealer, and its parent company TCL Multimedia Technology Holdings Limited

(2) Vizio, Inc., an American LCD TV manufacturer

(3) Lowe's home center LLC, an American retailer of LED lighting and other products, and its affiliated enterprise LG sourcing, Inc., which is an American distributor

(4) feit electric company, Inc., an American LED lighting manufacturer and distributor

in these proceedings, Riya claimed that the above defendant infringed its U.S. Patent No. 9490411, and requested the court to issue an injunction to prohibit the defendant from selling and distributing infringing products, while requesting damages

[Nichia vs Yiguang]

on January 10, 2017, Nichia issued a draft that the court of appeal of Dusseldorf, Germany, made a second instance judgment (case No.: i-15u31/14) on December 22, 2016, and found that six white LED products of Yiguang and its German subsidiary Everlight Electronics Europe GmbH infringed Nichia's YAG patent (European Patent No. EP, German corresponding No. de)

[lynk vs acuity brands, Schneider Electric]

in June 2015, lynk, a leading LED technology manufacturer, filed a lawsuit against Juno lighting group, and later sued Schneider Electric for infringement of its patents and breach of contract. After acuity brands acquired Juno lighting group, lynk separately listed acuity as the defendant in the patent infringement case. He has filed a lawsuit in the strict court of Illinois for nearly two years

on March 1, 2017, lynk labs, Inc. announced that the company had reached a secret settlement with acuity brands, Inc. and Schneider Electric in their patent infringement and breach litigation. Under the agreement, acuity and its affiliates were partially licensed from the patent portfolio owned by lynk labs

[ruigao vs HTC intelligent agent]

on March 30, 2017, Tridonic Jennersdorf GmbH, an affiliate of Dornbirn and a member of Zumtobel group lighting group, filed a lawsuit against s-kon ekontor 24 GmbH in Germany. The object of the lawsuit filed in the Munich district court is the sales of smart products produced by Taiwan HTC company

the b.o.s.e. alliance jointly formed by tridic Jennersdorf GmbH, Toyota synthesis Co., Ltd. of Japan, leuchtstofferk breitungen GmbH of Germany and litec GBR has the basic patent for the LED technology of converting the combination of blue LED chip and yellow silicate phosphor into white light. Ruigao believes that the intelligence of the litigation object infringes several patents owned by the b.o.s.e. alliance

[Seoul semiconductor vs mouser]

on April 13, 2017, Seoul semiconductor said that the company filed a lawsuit with the Dusseldorf District Court in Germany over the infringement of its high-power LED related patents by mouser electronics, a global electronic component distributor

according to the relevant person of Seoul semiconductor, the patent infringement product is the high-power LED produced by the world's top ten LED manufacturers - yiphotoelectron and most LED manufacturers. Mouser became the object of this lawsuit because of the sales and circulation of LED products manufactured by these enterprises. In the lawsuit, Seoul semiconductor requested to issue infringement prohibition orders, recall and destroy the infringing products for these infringing products, in order to believe that many customers have great doubts and make damages

[Veeco vs SGL]

in April 2017, Veeco, the U.S. manufacturer with the highest market share in the world, sued SGL, a graphite pallet manufacturer, for infringement, claiming that the company had infringed four patents owned by Veeco. Veeco asked SGL to stop selling infringing pallets and compensate for huge losses

[crystal vs Lowe's]

on May 4, 2017, crystal issued a draft. The company filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Lowe's companies, Inc. and Lowe's home centers, LLC in the District Court of central California on April 28, 2017, U.S. time. In the complaint, crystal electric pointed out that the Kichler lighting and utilitech products sold by Lowe's infringed several crystal electric patents, and applied to the court for an injunction to prohibit Lowe's from continuing to sell the infringed Kichler lighting and utilitech products

[Mitsubishi Chemical vs Intemet]

on November 2, 2016, China Intemet Optoelectronics (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. filed a request for invalidation with the Patent Reexamination Board for the Chinese patent of red phosphor widely used in LED shared by MCC and NIMS

on May 26, 2017, Mitsubishi Chemical Co., Ltd. and the national research and Development Corporation Material Research Institute announced that the examination decision had been received on May 10, 2017 for the invalidation request made by Intemet. The Committee comprehensively rejected the claim of Intemet optoelectronics and maintained the validity of this patent

[Yiguang vs Nichia, xitecheng, Daguang]

on May 5, 2017, Yiguang released a draft. The company filed a patent infringement lawsuit with the Tokyo District Court on April 25, 2017, accusing Nichia Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., xitecheng Electronics Co., Ltd. and Daguang electric Co., Ltd. of infringing Yiguang's patented technology

Yiguang asked the court to issue an injunction against the cob products of Nichia chemical and Xi'an Tiecheng, as well as the automobile large lamp products carrying the cob, including the prohibition of trafficking, manufacturing, import and export, inventory destruction and damage compensation

[Yiguang vs Seoul semiconductor]

on May 8, 2017, Yiguang released a draft. On May 4, 2017, the company filed a patent infringement lawsuit with the District Court of Mannheim, Germany, accusing Seoul semiconductor of infringing Yiguang's patented technology. Yiguang asked the court to issue an injunction against the infringing products of Seoul semiconductor, including the prohibition of hardness expression, which is generally divided into absolute hardness and relative hardness, including selling, manufacturing, import and export, recycling, inventory destruction and damage compensation

[nitriding vs rayvio]

on May 23, 2017, nitriding Semiconductor Co., Ltd. ("nitriding") filed a patent infringement lawsuit in the federal court for the Northern District of California, USA

in the indictment, nitriding is seeking injunctions, damages and accounting, claiming that rayvio infringed the patent of nitriding (US 6861270, "method of manufacturing gallium nitride compound semiconductors and luminous elements") and manufactured its products. This patented invention greatly promotes the improvement of LED luminous efficiency

[Seoul semiconductor vs mouser]

on May 25, 2017, Seoul semiconductor said that it had filed a patent infringement lawsuit against mouser Electronics (a global electronic component distributor) which was selling LED products made by Taiwan Yiguang to the court of Dusseldorf, Germany

[Guizhou luxtar vs huati technology]

on the evening of July 24, huati technology announced that it had received a civil lawsuit, and Guizhou luxtar Lighting Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Guizhou luxtar) sued huati technology and other three defendants for patent infringement, involving 32.4206 million yuan

[pry vs Yiguang]

Bridgelux filed a counterclaim against Yiguang in the Northern District Court of California on August 1, 2017, demanding compensation for past and current patent losses, and requesting to prohibit Yiguang from continuing to sell related products in the United States. Puri believes that the product series of Yiguang, including 2835 and cob, infringe four patents of Puri, including U.S. patents 6869812, 8567988, 8256929 and 8092051

[Seoul semiconductor vs American lighting company]

Seoul semiconductor and its subsidiaries said on September 19 that they had filed a patent infringement lawsuit in the federal court of California against the American LED lighting company, which infringed on the acrich technology of its subsidiary and sold its products

Seoul semiconductor adopts high-precision 24bit SA/D, sampling frequency 200Hz, automatic file change, and the resolution of the whole process is 1/1000000. In the complaint, it said that several LED lamps, including filament LED lamps, sold by archipelago lighting, Inc., infringed 12 relevant patents of Seoul semiconductor. The infringing acrich patents of Seoul semiconductor include high-voltage drive LED driving technology, multi chip manufacturing and multi junction technology (MJT), LED packaging, filament LED manufacturing technology, LED epitaxial growth and chip manufacturing technology, which are all core technologies necessary for manufacturing and driving LED

[Li Neng lighting vs a light source factory]

Li Neng lighting sued a Lighting Co., Ltd. in Zhongshan City and a lighting appliance factory in Guzhen, Zhongshan City. The appearance patent infringement case (2016 Yue 73 min Chu No. 1476) finally fell. Li Neng lighting has received documents such as the civil judgment and the certificate of effectiveness of judgment documents from Guangzhou intellectual property court

in this case, the Guangzhou intellectual property court ruled that Leneng lighting won the lawsuit, and the defendants, a Lighting Co., Ltd. in Zhongshan and a lighting appliance factory in Guzhen, Zhongshan, infringed on the design patent (application No. zl.3) of Leneng lighting "decorative cover (LED bulb)"

[crystal vs All Star lighting supplies]

crystal issued a statement on October 19, saying that the LED filament bulb products sold by American all star lighting supplies under the luxrite brand infringed many American patents of crystal. Therefore, it has filed a patent infringement lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey and applied to the court for issuing an injunction, All star lighting supplies is prohibited from continuing to sell infringing products

[overclocking III vs Shenzhen anlehui, Dongguan anlehui, and Jing Richeng]

on November 10, overclocking III issued an announcement that the company had filed a lawsuit against Shenzhen anlehui Lighting Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Shenzhen anlehui"), Dongguan anlehui Zhaoming Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Dongguan anlehui") Shenzhen jingricheng Lighting Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "jingricheng") filed a lawsuit on the infringement of the company's intellectual property rights

overclocking III believes that the products produced and sold by Shenzhen anerhui and Dongguan anerhui, such as "plastic clad aluminum projection lamp" and "ultra-thin projection lamp", use the invention patent "led lamp" (Patent No.: zl.x) and utility model patent "led lamp" (Patent No.: zl.1) owned by overclocking III The technical solutions of the four patents of design patent "projection lamp (TG3) (Patent No.: zl.3) and utility model patent" projection lamp and its fastener "(Patent No.: zl.5) are infringing goods that infringe the above patent rights of the company